How I Sold Gaslight On Our New Brand
8 January 2013

How I Sold Gaslight On Our New Brand

The scariest task to be given to a brand new designer on a first day: “Rebrand our company”. Even scarier? There is no one decision maker. So began the Gaslight rebranding!

A little backstory. Before I began at Gaslight, I had interned with 4 graphic design firms. Each had different emphasis, from Pampers packaging to doing the field wall for the Orange Bowl. The one thing in common with all of these places was that design was the emphasis. We didn’t worry about how anything worked, just that it was designed on the surface. Gaslight is different. But that’s another blogpost, for another day.

So back to the challenge at hand: a rebrand. Something I had experience in school, but never in the real world. I was confident I could produce the work, but I encountered a new obstacle: at every point of the process, I was selling the idea of a brand to the company, and it was not always easy. First off, I had to grasp that I’m not the intern anymore, nor am I a junior designer (aka glorified intern). I’m in charge, and have to trust my instincts. I get to put my stamp on things, I get to be involved, I feel like I’m making a real impact right away. I had a group of people that was ready… ok kinda ready, to open their company up to a new approach. I was up for the challenge, and after a bumpy start, finally got the design and opinions moving in the right direction.

Now the good stuff.

image

What do I think a logo is? The “face of your company”, what people see on a site, on a card that represents your company. It can be as simple as swoosh, or as hated a square with the word “Gap” written next to it. Once the name Gaslight was settled on, I began the process of creating a logo for the company. I’m traditional and I like to start with paper sketches. I often find my thoughts more confined when I first begin on the computer. With pen and paper, I have the ability to get a lot of ideas out quickly. No matter how much of a hurry I am in, for logo or a UI, I always start this way because the end product is always more well thought-out.

Next, I picked a few sketches and started to digitalize them, still playing with forms and typefaces. At this point, everything is in black and white as well. I also made the decision to move away from the flame icon. It’s a fine icon, but it’s so hard to come up with an ownable mark that is a flame. The company was split, some wanted a flame reference, some wanted something new. Happily for me, a very geometric and different direction was chosen.

image image image image image

The original idea of the mark came from playing with , which are an integral part of the coding process. As I moved things around, I eventually settled on this strong mark, that resembled an abstracted gaslight. When I create a logo, it’s really important to me that it can stand on it’s own. It doesn’t need colored shapes behind it, it reads just as fine from 20 feet away and at 1 inch high. This mark is tough, and can stand up being put on a busy background. With this strong basis, I have more freedom to play with supporting elements.

Once the mark was drawn, I moved onto choosing a typeface. In case you’re curious, we chose DIN, a wonderful sans serif, with a little flair on the letters. We can’t be boring. I set the name in all caps to get those straight lines across, reinforcing the geometric qualities.

The colors? There is where I have a little less reasoning. There is so much blue out in the tech world, and I wanted to show we were different. The pop-y, primary colors allowed a sense of whimsy into our otherwise very geometric mark. We are a creative bunch, and I wanted to show that off.

So, we have a gaslight, rendered in a strong geometric form. It’s a little playful, but still strong and established, like the company it’s representing. Boom, logo.

Done? Not at all. I’ll have to admit, many were underwhelmed at the new company logo and held onto the old flame.

Buy-in factor: Low

Building a Brand

At this point we had a logo. That’s it. A logo doesn’t create an experience: a brand does. We forged forward creating elements that could be used to create a look that could elevate the logo and represent the team. How we treat type, how we use the brand colors, using photography and texture, copy, all of this fuels a brand experience. This was done by exploring how our brand stood in print, in the environment, and of course digitally.

In Print

The first thing that really had some “brand” to it was our business card. Yes there was the logo, but the type treatment, cut corner, and graphic on the front all elevated elements of the logo and creates an experience. I was starting to establish the feel of our brand, and how we were perceived beyond a logo.

image

Another thing on the top of the list was a postcard to announce the new and improved Gaslight. It was meant to spark an interest in how we are different… we’re bigger and better. It was also our first crack at copy-writing in our brand voice. We wanted the voice to be fun and conversational. We’re more than faceless people; We’re trying to have fun with who we are with some customized code.

This was the first turning point, when the Gaslight team realized that there is more to this than a logo. There was a voice behind us, and a distinct style. I was starting to get some thumbs up where before I got frowns.

Buy-in factor: Medium

Environment

At the same time all this was occurring, our office-mates at Neo headed out to their new pad. We were left with a ton of space and a lot of white walls. White is boring, and we’re not a boring group of people. Brands don’t have to live on a computer or on a piece of paper, it can be alive in the environment. Big agencies have a branded area where people have an experience when they walk in. Why couldn’t we do that? I had a branded space vision, but when the black chalkboard paint went up on the first wall, it wasn’t looks of joy that I saw. As we painted the back of the room grey, another eye-browing raising choice at first, and moved onto our old blue wall, there began the “you know, I really like this.” Gaslight went from scared of the black and grey, to wanting to paint the whole place.

image

It wasn’t just paint. We created a sitting, creative area around the chalkboard wall for brainstorms. It’s fun to get your hands dirty sometimes! We finished off one of the grey walls with icons and quotes representing Gaslight, and stuck a giant logo in our front room, as well as our door.

image image image

So after a step back at first, the painting ended up being a huge step forward in terms of brand confidence. I think at this point, even if there were little things some team members didn’t like, overall it was getting the greenlight from everyone.

Buy-in factor: High

Web

We’re a company that puts out a digital product, so of course web presence is important. All of this preliminary work affected how I’ve approached the design of the website, and designing the website has made me rethink some aspects of the preliminary pieces. Let me explain. When we first put up a landing page to replace the old Gaslight Software site, it was right in the beginning, and by beginning, I mean we had the logo. I wasn’t sure what exactly our brand looked like yet. So we put something up that worked for the time being. As I started working out the print pieces and the environment, I realized the landing page wasn’t conveying the mood for the direction we had moved in.

When I first started the site design, my main concept was a sense of guidance. We’re lighting your path. I loved this idea of having this glowing gaslight, which can help guide you on the right way for your project. I ran with this concept, playing up color separation and linear elements. After a couple weeks of feeling like the design wasn’t right, I stepped back and thought “How does this display on mobile?” Constrained by this, it actually helped me distill what I wanted to show, and what was most important. It was a turning point, and things flowed into place.

image

Like the brand, the website is meant to change and evolve. It’s a 1.0. I’m already thinking up ideas for the 1.2 and 2.0, but the groundwork is there. We have a solid direction, for the website and for the whole brand. It’s just time to keep building.

Buy-in factor: Gaslighters are proud to show off the brand

Conclusion

At the point I’m writing this, it’s been 6 months. That’s nothing in the corporate world I know, but it’s the perfect amount of time for a small business. I feel like as the brand was accepted, I was accepted into the Gaslight family. They have taught me so much by this experience, and I think I’ve taught them a thing or two on how branding can really elevate a business.

Over the past month or so, I’ve really firmed up how our brand is moving forward. There is a continuity between our office decorations to our website (woo plug), and that is what makes a brand. Hopefully you stick around with us, and watch our brand live and change!

Heads up! This article may make reference to the Gaslight team—that's still us! We go by Launch Scout now, this article was just written before we re-introduced ourselves. Find out more here.

Related Posts

Want to learn more about the work we do?

Explore our work

Ready to start your software journey with us?

Contact Us